- Determining Obviousness (or Not)
KSR International v. Teleflex, Inc.
Teleflex Patent No. 6,237,565
Post-KSR Examination Guidelines Update, Sept. 1, 2010
Comparative Perspective: Section 103’s European Counterpart — “Inventive Step”
Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. Infousa, Inc.
Perfect Web patent No. 6,631,400
Proctor & Gamble Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Proctor & Gamble patent No. 5,583,122
- Constructing the Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art
Daiichi Sankyo Co,, Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc.
Daiichi Patent No. 401,741
- Available Prior Art and the Analogous Art Doctrine
In re Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Icon Health Patent No. 5,676,624
Policy Perspective: Using § 103 as a Policy Tool